Case studies
Evidence, not adjectives
Client names are shared in conversation where permitted. The numbers are not embellished.
- Studies
- Three
- Sectors
- Four
- Shortest
- 9 months
- Confidentiality
- Respected
A 30-minute working conversation, directly with RAKA.
Selected work
Three engagements in detail
Each began with a diagnostic and ended with a repeatable operating rhythm.
At a glance
Sectors and outcomes
A summary view of the work across sectors.
| Sector | Engagement | Headline result |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing | Repositioning a component maker as a systems partner | +18% average deal value |
| Technology | Resetting demand generation around payback, not volume | -34% cost per qualified opportunity |
| Services | Building a leadership voice into an inbound engine | 26 published pieces in year one |
- 0
- Published case studies
- 0%
- Peak pipeline uplift
- 0%
- Average deal value uplift
- 0
- Published pieces in year one
Measured outcomes
The numbers behind the work
Aggregate movement across published engagements, indexed from the start of each mandate.
Blended qualified pipeline index (start = 100)
Published engagements by sector
- Manufacturing & industrial40%
- Technology & SaaS33%
- Professional services27%
Patterns
What repeats across engagements
Different sectors, same three levers, position, price and channel allocation.
+41%
Pipeline uplift
Highest recorded four-quarter movement in qualified pipeline.
+18%
Deal value
Average uplift achieved without volume discounting.
−26%
Cost per opportunity
From reallocating spend away from unproductive channels.
9 mo
Shortest mandate
Diagnostic to a self-running quarterly rhythm.
3
Sectors published
Manufacturing, technology and professional services.
100%
Named owners
Every action in every plan carried an internal owner.
Enquiries
Start with a 30-minute conversation
Directly with RAKA. No deck, no pitch, a working discussion about where brand is failing to produce revenue.